![]() To conclude, if you are looking for an intuitive tool to find identical files on your Windows PC, Easy Duplicate Finder is a great match.ĭownload Easy Duplicate Finder ( Free with limited features, $39.95 for 1 computer and 1 year of updates) 6. Not to mention, the newest version 7 of Easy Duplicate Finder is blazing fast and consumes less memory. ![]() So even if the name or size is different, it can reliably find matching files. It checks the SHA256 hash checksum to find genuine duplicate files in your system. There are various scan modes for different file types such as photos, music, emails, contacts, etc. Not just that, you can also connect your cloud services like Google Drive and Dropbox and find duplicate files there too. Nevertheless, the free version offers all the basic features for you to easily locate duplicates in your system and free up disk space. It includes limited features under the free version, and all features are unlocked if you choose to upgrade to the premium plan. Easy Duplicate FinderĪs the name suggests, Easy Duplicate Finder is indeed a straightforward tool to scan and locate duplicate files on Windows. To sum up, Auslogics Duplicate File Finder is another great tool for Windows users, and you should give it a try.ĭownload Auslogics Duplicate File Finder ( Free) 5. And for customization, you can set specific file types, drive locations, tags, and more. Auslogics has also developed a smart and intelligent algorithm to match files using various attributes, leading to near-zero false results. I read around for hours but I still don't completely get it.The best part is that it’s an entirely free tool for both home and commercial users. Sorry I have to bother you with something that's probably completely evident to you, but maybe this might reduce the number of support requests in general. If possible, could you please maybe add a simple kind of standard workflow diagram to the FAQ, and write one paragraph in the FAQ defining what "Delta values" exactly are? I suppose this is because I still didn't fully understand all of the logic behind DupeGuru. I'm sorry I can't help my friend all on myself here. My question would be, however, what my friend can do if he wants that the file with the oldest mtime is regarded as the reference, while only looking for duplicates that – apart from the mtime – are identical in name, filesize and content. I guess your hint brings us closer to a solution. We never saw that one because my friend only looked in the German FAQ, where this is not being discussed. Is this a bug, or a configuration issue, or an MX-16 issue?Īs you can see in the discussion, one of the MX-16 developers guesses that DupeGuru maybe cannot read timestamps, whereas I couldn't quite believe that. However, what DupeGuru actually does it is to offer the original for deletion, while not offering the (newer) copy to be deleted (you can't check it for deletion in the GUI). So you should think that DupeGuru would regard an original file in the original folder as being the original, and prefer to save the original and to delete the duplicate copy file (otherwise the application you made probably wouldn't be called "DupeGuru"). The copy of this folder was created approximately two hours later (at least that's what nemo tells me). The original folder in question was created on March 8th, 2017. So my friend has one prominent duplicate folder on his HDD with duplicate files in it. The pretext is: He copied one folder (let's call it "the original folder") to another folder before he travelled abroad, and then he copied that folder to a USB stick (which he took with him) before travelling in order to not loose his data in case the device he left at home gets stolen. My friend has a folder on his HDD which he once created when he had to travel abroad. I did a test run on a friend's historically grown data. I'm not sure if it really is a bug or rather a configuration issue, or some strange kind of behaviour that is related to MX-16 (and MX-16's dealing with timestamps). However, upon testing DupeGuru, it seems to me that it has a very severe bug enthreating its very function. One of the project's repo men thankworthily built a package from your 4.0.3 source code for the MX-Test Repo, and I'm presently testing it. MX-16 is an improved Debian not relying heavily on systemd, and it is becoming more and more popular. I have recently instigated that DupeGuru become part of the MX-16 project. First of all, a big thank-you for releasing this valuable piece of software into the sphere of freedom!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |